Suspicion for intimate reasons in the light of the new Code of Civil Procedure
Keywords:
judicial disqualification, recusal, inviolability, irreversibilityAbstract
This article analyzes the normative discipline, previous and current, of the judicial disqualification – also referred to as recusal – , examining the criticism regarding this institute. Subsequently, it focuses on the absolute inviolability of such recusal and its irreversibility, highlighting the impossibility of complaint, by the part, in what regards the disqualification.
References
BARBI, Celso Agrícola. Comentários ao código de processo civil. 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1983. v. I.
COSTA, Lopes da. Manual elementar de direito processual civil. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1982.
MIRABETE, Julio Fabbrini. Código de processo penal interpretado. 10. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2003.
MIRANDA, Francisco Cavalcanti Pontes de. Comentários ao código de processo civil. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1995. v. III.
PASSOS, José Joaquim Calmon de. O devido processo legal e o duplo grau de jurisdição. Revista Forense, Rio de Janeiro, v. 78, n. 277, jan./mar. 1982.
PAULA, Alexandre de. Código de processo civil anotado. 4. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 1988. v. I
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Reis Friede
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting the academic text to the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região), the authors declare to be the holders of the copyright, responding exclusively for any claims related to such rights; as well as guaranteeing the non-existence of any breach of academic ethics.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region the right of publication, without encumbrance and without limitations as to term, territory, or any other.
The concepts and opinions expressed in the signed works are the sole responsibility of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of this Journal, nor of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region.
