The principle of the primacy of the resolution of the merits and the new Code of Civil Procedure
Keywords:
New Code of Civil Procedure, Principle of primacy of resolution of the merits, applicationAbstract
The presentation of some rules for applying the principle of the primacy of the resolution of the merits had a single objective: to show that it is necessary to treat the Brazilian civil process of the 21st century as an efficient mechanism for producing constitutionally legitimate results. The judge of the 21st century must be seen as a guarantor of fundamental rights, and among these is undoubtedly the fundamental right of access to justice, understood here as the fundamental right to the production of constitutionally legitimate results through the process. Applying this principle will certainly require a change in the attitude (and culture) of judges: they need to see themselves as members of a working community, through which, together with the parties (and their lawyers), they will build the right decision for the specific case. This working community must therefore be understood in line with the paradigm of the Democratic State of Law, established by Article 1 of the Constitution of the Republic. The Brazilian civil procedure of the Democratic State, which the CPC of 2015 consolidates on the basis of a model established by the Constitution of the Republic of 1988, must be a participatory, cooperative process, capable - for this very reason - of leading to constitutionally legitimate decisions, which will preferably be decisions on the merits.
References
ANDOLINA, Italo; VIGNERA, Giuseppe. Il modello costituzionale del processo civile italiano. Turim: G. Giappichelli, 1990.
CÂMARA, Alexandre Freitas. Dimensão processual do princípio do devido processo constitucional. In: Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho
Procesal, vol. 1. São Paulo: RT, 2015.
CUNHA, Leonardo Carneiro da. Princípio da primazia do julgamento do mérito. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 01 jul. 2015.
DIDIER JÚNIOR, Fredie; NALINI, José Renato; RAMOS, Glauco Gumerato; LEVY, Wilson (coord.). Ativismo judicial e garantismo processual. Salvador: JusPodium, 2013.
FÉRRAND, Frédérique. Ideological background of the Constitution, Constitutional rules and civil procedure. In: International Association of Procedural Law Seoul Conference. Seul: IAPL, 2014.
NUNES, Dierle José Coelho. Comparticipação e policentrismo: horizontes para a democratização processual civil. Belo Horizonte: tese, 2008.
NUNES, Dierle; DELFINO, Lúcio. Juiz deve ser visto como garantidor de direitos fundamentais, nada mais. Disponível em: <http://www.conjur.com.br/2014-set-03/juizvisto-garantidor-direitos-fundamentais-nada>. Acesso em: 01 jul. 2015.
PICARDI, Nicola. Le riforme processuali e sociali di Franz Klein. In: Historia et ius – Rivista di storia giuridica dell’età medievale e moderna,
, vol. 2.
UZELAC, Alan. Goals of civil justice and civil procedure in the contemporary world: Global developments – towards harmonisation (and back). In: UZELAC, Alan (coord.). Goals of civil justice and civil procedure in contemporary judicial systems. Suíça: Springer, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting the academic text to the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região), the authors declare to be the holders of the copyright, responding exclusively for any claims related to such rights; as well as guaranteeing the non-existence of any breach of academic ethics.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region the right of publication, without encumbrance and without limitations as to term, territory, or any other.
The concepts and opinions expressed in the signed works are the sole responsibility of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of this Journal, nor of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region.





