Precautionary measures in Brazilian Criminal Procedure
reform with Law No. 12.403/2011
Keywords:
pre-trial detention, Law no. 12.403/2011, gravity of the factAbstract
Law no. 12. 403/2011, which amended Title IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, brought significant changes to the Brazilian legal system with regard to criminal procedural precautionary measures, especially with regard to the requirements for granting them, broadening them on the one hand - to allow them to be better adapted to the perpetrator of the crime, according to the seriousness of the crime and its real need for investigation or criminal investigation, for the application of the law and as a disincentive to new practices - and, on the other hand, restricting the hypotheses of granting precautionary prisons, according to quantitative criteria of penalties. However, although it seems clear that the new measures generally seek to prioritize the restriction of rights over custody in a penal institution, some of them appear to be difficult, or almost impossible, to comply with and/or monitor. It is not too much to point out from the outset that a precautionary measure applied and not complied with, without the state's supervision, renders it innocuous and ineffective, as well as demoralizing the state itself. If precautionary measures were introduced into the legal system with the aim of avoiding unnecessary imprisonment, it is essential that they are effectively enforced with the utmost rigor in order to achieve their objective.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
References
CALAMANDREI, Piero. Introduccion al estudio sistematico de las providencias cautelares. Buenos Aires: Librería El Foro, 1996.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting the academic text to the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região), the authors declare to be the holders of the copyright, responding exclusively for any claims related to such rights; as well as guaranteeing the non-existence of any breach of academic ethics.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region the right of publication, without encumbrance and without limitations as to term, territory, or any other.
The concepts and opinions expressed in the signed works are the sole responsibility of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of this Journal, nor of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region.





