Third-party intervention
Keywords:
Intervention by third parties, CPC 2015, Assistence, Denunciation of jurisdiction, SummonsAbstract
SUMMARY: I- Intervention by third parties. 1 - Concept and cases of appropriateness. II- Assistance. 2. concept. 3. preconditions for intervention. 4) Simple and joint legal assistance. 5. powers and procedural burdens of simple and joint legal assistants 6. the assistant's burdens and the limits of its action. 7. appeals. 8. atypical or negotiated assistance. 9. appeals by aggrieved third parties. III- Denunciation of jurisdiction. 10. concept. 11 - Obligation to report a claim. 12) Cases in which the notice of claim is not appropriate. 13. Purpose of the incident. 14. procedure. 15. effects of the notice of claim. 16. Compliance with the judgment accepting the claim. 17. Enforcement of the judgment. 18. Successive complaints. IV- Summons. 19. Concept. 20. Cases of admissibility of the incident (art. 130 of the NCPC). 21. Procedure. 22. Summons in civil liability insurance cases. V- Incident of disregard of legal personality. 23. Disregard of legal personality. 24. Inverse disregard of legal personality. 25. Procedure for the incident of disregard of legal personality. 26. Prevention of fraud. VI- Amicus curiae. 27. concept. 28. powers of the amicus curiae: oral argument and appeals.
References
AMARAL SANTOS, Moacyr. Primeiras linhas de direito processual civil. 2. ed. atualizada por Maria Beatriz Amaral Santos Köhnen. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2008.
ARRUDA ALVIM, José Manuel; ASSIS, Araken de; ARRUDA ALVIM, Eduardo. Comentários ao código de processo civil. 3. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2014.
ALVARO DE OLIVEIRA, Carlos Alberto; MITIDIERO, Daniel. Curso de processo civil. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010, v. I.
BUENO, Cassio Scarpinella. Curso sistematizado de direito processual civil. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2007, v. 2, t. I.
CUNHA, Leonardo Carneiro da. A assistência no projeto do novo CPC brasileiro. In: AURELLI, Arlete Inês, et al (coords.). O direito de estar em juízo e a coisa julgada: estudos em homenagem a Thereza Alvim. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2014.
DIDIER JR., Fredie; CUNHA, Leonardo Carneiro da. Curso de direito processual civil. 9. ed. Salvador: JusPodivm, 2011, v. 3.
DINAMARCO, Cândido Rangel. Instituições de direito processual civil. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2001, v. II.
GONÇALVES, Marcus Vinicius Rios. Novo curso de direito processual civil. 3. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2006.
GRECO, Leonardo. Instituições de processo civil. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2009, v. I.
GRECO FILHO, Vicente. Da intervenção de terceiros. 2. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1986.
MARQUES, José Frederico. Manual de direito processual civil. 1. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1974, v. I, n. 236.
MONIZ DE ARAGÃO. “Parecer”, in RF, v. 251, 1975.
MOREIRA, Barbosa. Direito processual civil. Rio de Janeiro: Borsoi, 1971.
MUÑOZ, Pedro Soares. Da intervenção de terceiros no novo código de processo civil. Estudos sobre o Novo Código de Processo Civil. 1974, v. I.
PONTES DE MIRANDA, Francisco Cavalcanti. Comentários ao código de processo civil. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1958-1961, v. II.
SOUZA, Miguel Teixeira de. Estudos sobre o novo processo civil. São Paulo: Lex, 1996.
TORNAGHI, Hélio. Comentários ao código de processo civil. São Paulo: RT, 1974, v. I.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting the academic text to the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região), the authors declare to be the holders of the copyright, responding exclusively for any claims related to such rights; as well as guaranteeing the non-existence of any breach of academic ethics.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region the right of publication, without encumbrance and without limitations as to term, territory, or any other.
The concepts and opinions expressed in the signed works are the sole responsibility of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of this Journal, nor of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region.





