Things rejudicated in proceedings with a declaration of an unconstitutional state of affairs
effects of judicial decisions with an unconstitutional state of affairs and their relationship with collective proceedings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65674/rev-trf3.v35i160.602Keywords:
judicial process, collective law, unconstitutional state of affairs, res judicata, effectsAbstract
The general aim of this study is to look at the effects of court decisions in cases declared unconstitutional in relation to collective proceedings, especially considering their importance in protecting the rights of the community involved, in order to contribute to improving the justice system and strengthening the defense of collective rights. The problem arose from the realization that lawsuits are instruments that seek to resolve conflicts; however, considering that there are countless demands and disputes within society, it was questioned whether there would be different solutions to a specific case. To carry out the research, the deductive method was used, with a qualitative approach, based on bibliographical and documentary research. In order to achieve the proposed objectives, the article covers the following topics: a) the relevance of judicial decisions in protecting fundamental rights; b) the theoretical and conceptual foundations of collective proceedings and the effects of judicial decisions; c) the effects of proceedings declared unconstitutional and their relationship with collective proceedings. In this study, it was found that, considering that collective rights are divided into diffuse rights, collective rights and individual homogeneous rights, each with various effects and particularities; the anomalous effects of decisions in collective proceedings must be verified, depending on the type of right involved, showing a broad relationship between collective proceedings and proceedings with a declaration of unconstitutional state of affairs, as legal instruments for resolving systemic violations, the effects of which can go beyond the sphere of rights of the plaintiffs.
References
BOBBIO, Norberto. A era dos direitos. 7. reimp. Trad. Carlos Nelson Coutinho. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2004. Disponível em: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/297730/mod_resource/content/0/norberto-bobbio-a-era-dos-direitos.pdf . Acesso em: 15 jun. 2023.
BRASIL. Constituição Federal. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2023.
BRASIL. Lei nº 7.347, de 24 de julho de 1985. Ação Civil Pública. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l7347orig.htm. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2023.
BRASIL. Lei nº 8.078, de 11 de setembro de 1990. Código de Defesa do Consumidor. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8078compilado.htm. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2023.
BRASIL. STF. Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental n. 760/DF, Tribunal Pleno, Relatora Ministra Carmen Lúcia, j. 14/03/2024, DJe 26/06/2024. Disponível em: https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudencia/obterInteiroTeor.asp?idDocumento=778063881. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2024.
BRASIL. STF. Medida Cautelar na Argüição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental 347/DF, Tribunal Pleno, Relator Ministro Marco Aurélio, j. 09/09/2015, DJe 18/02/2016. Disponível em: https://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=10300665. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2023.
BULOS, Uadi Lammêgo. Curso de direito constitucional. 10. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2017.
CAPELLETTI, Mauro. Repudiando Montesquieu? A expansão e legitimidade da Justiça Constitucional. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFRGS, Porto Alegre, v. 20, 2001. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/revfacdir/article/view/71892/40768. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2023.
COLÔMBIA. Corte Constitucional. Sentencia de Unificacíon 559, Sala Plena, Magistrado Ponente Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz, j. 06/11/1997. Disponível em: https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1997/SU559-97.htm. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2024.
COLÔMBIA. Corte Constitucional. Sentencia T-025/2004, Tercera Sala de Revisión, Magistrado Ponente Manuel José Cepeda-Espinoza, j. 22/01/2004. Disponível em: https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2004/t-025-04.htm. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2024.
DANTAS, Eduardo Souza. Ações estruturais e o estado de coisas inconstitucional: a tutela dos direitos fundamentais em caso de graves violações pelo poder público. Curitiba: Juruá, 2019.
FISS, Owen. To make the constitution a living truth – four lectures on the structure injunctions. In: ARENHART, Sérgio Cruz; JOBIM, Marco Félix (orgs.). Processos estruturais. Salvador: Juspodivm, 2021.
MEIRELLES, Hely Lopes. Direito administrativo brasileiro. 29. ed. atual. por Eurico de Andrade Azevedo, Délcio Balestero e José Emmanuel Burle Filho. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2004.
REGO, Carolina Noura de Moraes. O estado de coisas inconstitucional: entre o constitucionalismo e o estado de exceção. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Iuris, 2020.
SARLET, Ingo; MARINONI, Guilherme; MITIDIERO, Daniel. Curso de direito constitucional. 4. ed. atual. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2015.
SILVA, Lucas do Monte. A força normativa da Constituição. Revista do departamento de ciências jurídicas e sociais da Unijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, ano XXV, 2016. Resenha de HESSE, Konrad. Direito em debate. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2016.45.229-233. Acesso em: 21 maio 2024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Priscila Resende, Carla Vidal Gontijo Almeida, Samuel Alves Resende
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting the academic text to the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região), the authors declare to be the holders of the copyright, responding exclusively for any claims related to such rights; as well as guaranteeing the non-existence of any breach of academic ethics.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region the right of publication, without encumbrance and without limitations as to term, territory, or any other.
The concepts and opinions expressed in the signed works are the sole responsibility of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of this Journal, nor of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region.
