Judicial procedure in the event of the absence of the of the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office at the pre-trial hearing

(does the principle of real truth still exist?)

Authors

  • Paulo Bueno de Azevedo Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (SP)

Keywords:

judicial procedure, investigation hearing, absence of the Public Prosecutor's Office representative, principle of the real truth, opposition of witnesses

Abstract

This study analyzes a recent ruling by the Superior Court of Justice, which annulled a case in which the judge, in the absence of the Public Prosecutor's representative, asked questions of the prosecution witness. In addition to criticizing the Superior Court's position, a reflection is made on the principle of real truth.

Author Biography

  • Paulo Bueno de Azevedo, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (SP)

    Juiz Federal da Seção Judiciária de São Paulo; Mestre em Direito Político e Econômico pela Universidade
    Presbiteriana Mackenzie; Especialista em Direito Penal Econômico Europeu pela Universidade de Coimbra.

References

BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Processual Penal. Recurso Especial. Nova redação do artigo 212 do Código de Processo Penal, trazida pela Lei nº 11.690/08. Recurso Especial nº 1.259.482-RS (2011/0144920-4). Órgão Julgador: 5ª Turma. Relator: Ministro Marco Aurélio Bellizze. Brasília, DF, 4 de outubro de 2011. Disponível em: <https://ww2.stj.jus.br/revistaeletronica/ita.asp?registro=201101449204&dt_publicacao=27/10/2011>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2012.

CARVALHO, Amilton Bueno de. Eles, os juízes criminais, vistos por nós, os juízes criminais. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2011.

LOPES JR., Aury. Ausência do Ministério Público na audiência de instrução e a postura do juiz à luz do art. 212 do CPP. Boletim IBCCrim, São Paulo, ano 19, n. 229, p. 3-5, dez. 2011.

SOUZA, Bernardo de Azevedo e; OLIVEIRA, Daniel Kessler de. Entre “justiceiros” e “samambaias”: reflexões constitucionais sobre a iniciativa probatória do juiz no processo penal. Revista Síntese: Direito Penal e Processual Penal, Rio Grande do Sul, n. 70, p. 90-102, out./nov. 2011.

Downloads

Published

2012-02-10

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 111 (2012)

Section

Artigos

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

By submitting the academic text to the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região), the authors declare to be the holders of the copyright, responding exclusively for any claims related to such rights; as well as guaranteeing the non-existence of any breach of academic ethics.

The authors retain the copyright and grant the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region the right of publication, without encumbrance and without limitations as to term, territory, or any other.

The concepts and opinions expressed in the signed works are the sole responsibility of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of this Journal, nor of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region.

How to Cite

Judicial procedure in the event of the absence of the of the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office at the pre-trial hearing: (does the principle of real truth still exist?). (2012). Revista Do Tribunal Regional Federal Da 3ª Região, 23(111), 4-11. https://revista.trf3.jus.br/index.php/rtrf3/article/view/643