Modulation of the effects of decisions provided by the Supreme Federal Court in control of constitutionality and legal security in face of the rescission action
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65674/rev-trf3.v35i159.500Keywords:
Legal Security, Modulation of decision effects, Termination ActionAbstract
The present study deals with the way in which the modulation of the temporal effects of the decision in constitutionality control presents itself as a safeguard of legal certainty, specifically considering the new hypothesis of rescission action, and its differentiated statute of limitations, provided for in the current Code of Civil Procedure, specifically in articles 525, § 15 and 535, § 8. Initially, legal security and its scope were addressed, emphasizing its importance as a fundamental right, even exposing the special emphasis that the current CPC gave to the institute, aiming to guarantee it and make it effective. Then, the aspects of the temporal modulation of the effects of the decision in constitutionality control and its importance as a means of guaranteeing legal certainty are exposed, also highlighting the provisions of the CPC on the subject. Furthermore, the study of the hypothesis of a rescission action against an unappealable decision based on a rule later held by the STF as unconstitutional, was addressed, with special emphasis on the statute of limitations of the aforementioned action and the understanding of the consolidated STF in a direction contrary to that provided for in the CPC, while the CPC was still in the vacatio legis period. Finally, the relevance and importance of the modulation of the effects as an instrument guaranteeing legal certainty is analyzed, in view of the aforementioned termination action and, especially, due to its statute of limitations differentiated from other termination actions.
References
ALCALÁ, Humberto Nogueira. Consideraciones sobre las sentencias de los Tribunales Constitucionales y sus efectos en América del Sur. Revista Ius et Praxis, v. 10, n. 1, 2004, p. 113-158. Disponível em: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-00122004000100005. Acesso em: 29 jun. 2021.
BRASIL. Código de Processo Civil – Lei nº 13.105, de 16 de março de 2015. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm. Acesso em: 29 jun. 2021.
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, de 5 de outubro de 1988. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 29 jun. 2021.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. ADI 1.220/DF, Relator Ministro Roberto Barroso, j. 19/12/2019, DJe 13/03/2020. Disponível em: https://jurisprudencia.stf.jus.br/pages/search/sjur420572/false. Acesso em: 28 jun. 2021.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. RE 197.917/SP, Relator Ministro Maurício Corrêa, j. 06/06/2002, DJe 07/05/2004. Disponível em: https://jurisprudencia.stf.jus.br/pages/search/sjur12989/false. Acesso em: 28 jun. 2021.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. RE 730.462/SP, Relator Ministro Teori Zavascki, j. 28/05/2015, DJe 09/09/2015. Disponível em: https://jurisprudencia.stf.jus.br/pages/search/sjur318554/false. Acesso em: 05 nov. 2019.
BRASIL. Tribunal Regional Federal da 4ª Região. Agravo de Instrumento 5007528-55.2017.4.04.0000, j. 19/04/2017. Disponível em: https://jurisprudencia.trf4.jus.br/pesquisa/inteiro_teor.php?orgao=1&documento=8892552 Acesso em: 05 nov. 2019.
DIDIER JUNIOR, Fredie; CUNHA, Leonardo Carneiro. Curso de direito processual civil: meios de impugnação às decisões judiciais e processo nos tribunais. 14. ed. Salvador: Jus Podivm, 2017.
HIRSCHL, Ran. O novo constitucionalismo e a judicialização da política pura no mundo. Trad. Diego Werneck Arguelhes e Pedro Jimenez Cantisano. Revista de Direito Administrativo, v. 75, n. 2, 2006.
MENDES, Gilmar Ferreira; BRANCO, Paulo Gustavo Gonet. Curso de direito constitucional, 13. ed. rev. e atual. São Paulo: Saraiva Educação, 2018.
NERY JUNIOR, Nelson. Princípios do processo na Constituição Federal: processo civil, penal e administrativo. 12. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2016.
SARLET, Ingo Wolfgang. A eficácia do direito fundamental à segurança jurídica: dignidade da pessoa humana, direitos fundamentais e proibição de retrocesso no direito constitucional brasileiro. Revista de Direito Constitucional e Internacional, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 57, out./dez. 2006
SARLET, Ingo Wolfgang; MARINONI, Luiz Guilherme; MITIDIERO, Daniel. Curso de direito constitucional. 10. ed., São Paulo: Saraiva Educação, 2021.
TAVARES, André Ramos. Curso de direito constitucional. 18. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva Educação, 2020.
THAMAY, Rennan Faria Krüger. A coisa julgada no controle de constitucionalidade abstrato. São Paulo: Atlas, 2015.
THEODORO JUNIOR, Humberto. Curso de direito processual civil. v. I. 59. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2019.
THEODORO JUNIOR, Humberto; FARIA, Juliana Cordeiro. A coisa julgada inconstitucional e os instrumentos processuais para o seu controle. Revista Síntese de Direito Civil e Processo Civil, v. 4, n. 19, Porto Alegre: Síntese, set./out. 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Paulo Chaves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting the academic text to the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região), the authors declare to be the holders of the copyright, responding exclusively for any claims related to such rights; as well as guaranteeing the non-existence of any breach of academic ethics.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region the right of publication, without encumbrance and without limitations as to term, territory, or any other.
The concepts and opinions expressed in the signed works are the sole responsibility of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of this Journal, nor of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region.
